Bau wrote:
yes thanks for playing with me, no one ever does xxxx
no worries my dear xxx, but I think some of these posts are going to cause some heated exchanges between us due to time delays - ah what the hell its fun
Bau wrote:
if you were a critter or had broader horizons into such a world you wouldn't have to ask me that.
My horizons are quite broad in that world thanks... just currentl y pointed in a distinctly feline direction at the moment, that's why we're not gelling particularly well... just making sure we were currently on the same wavelength
Bau wrote:
I'm not sure why you think I hate males either. You seemed to indicate this in your last post to me. Do you have some sort of hang up about feminists? I 'm not one you know, I'm very old fasioned.
In short because you frequently seem to come off as having a hate thing against men - at least as I see it.. I've got no qualm about feminists though - I think its a very good thing for women and men to be treated equally - I'm all in favour of that ..... except modern feminists I have spoken to normally want the balance tipped in the favour of women.... equality means just that 'both sides being equal'. I do think the modern feminist movement has done a massive disservice to the majority of women though
Bau wrote:
certainly he was! he talked about embodying the spirit of a lion and the way I read about the atavism stuff, it certainly sounded just like m-shifting, even if he realy didn't know what it was. They didn't have the net back then and online werecommunities , I'm sure it was impossible to hook up with other back then.
I meant he wasn't at peace with being a therianthrope (he clearly was a therianthrope and yes his atavistic states are practically the same as M-shifting - no argument there)
Bau wrote:
you misunderstood me.
see he realised he was at his best just hanging out with his cats and feline counterparts instead of humans who don't get it.
ah yes... my error - I did misunderstand you
Bau wrote:
no no no I heartly disagree, you are misinterareting something in the bible then. sorrow is a part of life for everyone- with true enlightenment and understanding come a way to find true joy despite the worst of your trouble and sorrow. this truth he never found it sounds like , which is very sad. Like Carl saying in his interview that its a 'shit world'
if that is how he sees it my heart bleeds. Its not an easy word adn humans have certainly messed things up but there is so much kindness in people and good too. I used to realy loath all humans and being one terribly , until I broadend my horizons. I still don't prefer it though
No I get what your saying.... I may not be explaining myself very well here.... but if I remember correctly (granted I may not be) the quote refers to increasing ones 'wisdom' rather than 'knowledge' - would you agree? It helps to know that in old speak when 'wisdom' was referenced it meant normal every day earthly 'wisdom' (i.e. information) and that 'knowledge' referred to 'initimate knowing' of something - usually in a spiritual sense i.e. enlightenment (but could also mean in an earthly sense as in 'to have carnal knowledge'). That being the case increasing ones 'wisdom' (information) leads to increasing sorrow (and by inference increasing ones 'knowledge' i.e enlightenment, doesn't increase sorrow). If you followed that essentially we both said the same thing
Bau wrote:
I have a problem with sex? you seem to do an awful lot of judging and mis judging of me for someone who keeps telling me not to judge.
merely making an observation... no judgement was involved - a question was involved though.... even if it was rhetorical
Bau wrote:
YOU don't know much about the nature and chemisty of sex... or humor... or yourself.
Ooo let me get comfy.... right, come on then hit me with some of this wonderful specialist insight of yours....
Bau - all I am to you is some dots on the end of a screen and that's all you are to me, you have no real idea what I do or do not know and vice versa. I probably do have more of an idea about the nature and chemistry of sex than you give me credit for - at least from a strictly biological angle - granted my ideas about sex from the emotional angle are somewhat more suspect as I'm not an emotional person. As for humour.... well humour is something of a subjective thing so you evidently don't get where my sense of humour is coming from, but thats ok because I frequently have trouble seeing where yours is
Bau wrote:
and that it for me, you are too wibbly wobbly in your ideas , like my ferret when he plays, it makes me tired.
but I have hardly started.... no wonder no one plays with you if you run off